![]() ![]() Report: Google Turns Off ‘Newspeak’ Correction Tool (For Now)Ĭommenting on the latest example, Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent, warned “Some people might regard these ultra-woke suggestions as harmless and even amusing. The controversy will do little to help her and Harry’s reputation as emotionally incontinent, narssisistic grievance grifters. The moaning Duchess was said to be “upset and overwhelmed” by the episode, in a familiar pattern to how she overreacts to any and all criticism. “The Sussexes’ spokesperson said the idea of the animated television sketch having legal ramifications was “all frankly nonsense” and “totally baseless and boring,” reports the Telegraph. However, their legal team appears to have swiftly concluded that no legal action will be pursued. Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told GB News that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are in “serious trouble” if their popularity plummets in the US. Observers noted that they were more sensitive over the South Park episode because it would primarily be seen by an American audience. Opinion polls in the UK show that Megan is the least popular royal aside from only Prince Andrew. This prompted a further wave of ridicule, with many asking if the royals seriously believed they could sue comedy writers for making jokes about their behavior and hurting their feelings. Royal commentator Neil Sean revealed, “Their legal team are casting an eye over the episode to see what is wrong, and what could be turned into something more sinister.” The show made fun of Harry and Meghan constantly complaining about their privacy being invaded while simultaneously being on a ‘World Wide Privacy Tour’ of relentless self-publicity. Perhaps fearing even further ridicule, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have gone cold on the idea of suing the creators of South Park for making fun of them in a recent episode.Īs we highlighted yesterday, the whinging couple reportedly had their lawyers pour over the episode to see if it contained anything “sinister” that could be legally actionable. They may very well have one because they’re racist.” He added, “So you shouldn’t assume someone isn’t racist just because they own a minority sex servant. Griffin wrote “While I’m not suggesting Bill Burr is a racist, a white man having a non-white wife can sometimes be a sign of racism.” Which is exactly what they did, with many also accusing Burr of being racist for admitting he couldn’t pronounce the name of the winning artist.Ĭlayburn Griffin, who appears to be an out and out leftist, but strangely also seems to be a failed Republican politician, suggested that Burr married actress Nia Hill, a black woman, in order to “own a minority sex servant.” Comedian Bill Burr was accused Monday of being racist because he married a black woman.īurr was in the news after he appeared at the Grammy awards to present an award for Best Tropical Latin Album, and joked that “feminists are, like, going nuts” asking “Why is the cis-white male doing all this Latino stuff?” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |